Chapter 7
1 Cf. Magyar Em1élek, iv,
551; Károly Veszély, Erdélyi Egyháztörténetelmi Adatok
(Contributions to the church history of Transylvania), Kolozsvár,
1860, p. 233. In the records of this Diet is found the first known use
of the word Unitaria in any public document.
2 Cf. Uzoni, Historia, i,
387.
3 The date was July 17, 1603.
The site of the battle is variously designated. The most precise
definition makes it at Rosenau, some eleven miles southwest of Brassó.
Other authorities name the valley of Alabor near the paper-mill; also
Apáczá. A monument was erected on the spot where the fallen were
buried. It bore the pathetic inscription:
Quos genuit cives, hic Transylvania claudit.
Heu, parvo tumulo quanta ruina jacet!
4 For the gruesome details cf.
Bod, Historia, i, 474 f, quoting Thuanus; Isthvánfius,
Historia, p. 784.
5 Cf. Uzoni, Historia,
ii, 627–636.
6 Cf. Lampe, Historia, p.
335, Bod, Historia, ii, 5.
7 Cf. Uzoni, Historia,ii,
961–964.
8 Cf. Uzoni, Historia,
ii, 963 f.
9 Cf. Uzoni, op. cit.,
ii, 647.
10 Cf. Uzoni, op. cit.,
ii, 648–651.
11 Cf. Uzoni Historia,
ii, 652 f; i, 353.
12 Cf. his Transslvania
(1584), p. 66; Epistolae et Acta, i, 280.
13 For the best exhaustive
study of Sabbatarianism, cf. Samuel Kohn, Die Sabbatharier in
Siebenbürgen (Budapest, 1894), being a revised and abridged
translation of the author’s A Sombatosok történetük, etc.
(History of the Sabbatarians), Budapest, 1889. Cf. also László Köváry,
‘A Szombatosok irodalmi maradványai’ etc. (The literary remains . . .
of the Sabbatarians), Keresztény Magvetö, xxi (1886), 6–20,
76–88, 142–152; Uzoni, Historia, i, 80–86.
14 Cf. József Ferencz, ‘Dávid
Ferencz és a Szombatosság’ (F. D. and Sabbatarianism), Keresztény
Magvetö, ix (1874), 338.
15 Cf. Boros, Krónika, i,
27–30; László Köváry, ‘Péchi Simon Kancellár’ (S. P., Chancellor)
Keresztény Magvetó, vi (1871), 35 ff; Kohn, op. cit., pp.
39–45.
16 Cf. Kohn, Sabbatharier,
pp. 85–97.
17 Cf. Magyar Emlékek,
iii, 348.
18 Cf. Magyar Emlékek,
vi, 170.
19 Ibid., vii, 488.
20 It can not have failed to
affect the fortunes of the Sabbatarians that Pécsi who, though
nominally a Unitarian was at heart a confirmed Sabbatarian, was for
twenty years from 1601 in offices of the highest influence under
successive Princes, being at last Chancellor under Gabriel Bethlen. He
will quietly have used his influence in favor of moderation.
21 Magyar Emlékek, v,
165.
22 Cf. Mikó, Adatok, i,
29; Kohn, Sabbatharier, p. 106.
23 He was the son of Matthew
Radecki, long Secretary of the city of Danzig (v. supra ,i,
505). The chief pastor of Kolozsvár, when a fugitive in Poland in
1603–04 from the fury of Básta, was treated by him with great kindness
and formed a warm friendship with him. Returning home he so strongly
recommended Radecki that the authorities at Kolozsvár invited him to
leave his post as Rector of the school at Lucławice and become Pastor
of the Saxon Unitarian church at Kolozsvár (1605). He later became
chief pastor, and was Superintendent 1616–32, succeeding Toroczkai. He
was a fine scholar and an eloquent speaker, and though a Unitarian was
highly regarded by Bethlen for his Latin scholarship. In his time
Kolozsvár was terribly devastated and the rural churches were greatly
weakened by the plague; but he did all possible in difficult
circumstances to improve the discipline and good order of the
churches. Taught by this experience of the inconvenience of having a
Superintendent unable to speak their language, and thus hindered in
giving them efficient supervision by visitations away from Kolozsvár,
the Synod voted at his death that henceforth the Superintendent must
always be a Hungarian. Cf. Uzoni, Historia, ii, 695–974.
24 v. supra, Ms
p. 117.
25 Cf. Kohn, Sabbatharier,
p. 155.
26 Cf. Kohn, loc. cit.;
Katona István Geleji, Titkok titka (Mystery of mysteries —
i.e., the Trinity), Gyula Fehérvár, 1645, p. 22 of the preface;
Székely, Történetei, p. 132 f.
27 The Reformed writers usually
pass over this unsavory story very lightly (cf. Bod, Historia,
ii, 312, Geleji, op. cit., preface.) The version here given is
from Uzoni, Historia, ii 898–900, as handed down by
contemporary Unitarian witnesses. Cf. also the Ms church histories of
Szent Ábrahámi and Agh in the Unitarian library at Kolozsvár.
28 This simultaneum, as
it was called, is still practiced by one little community, that at
Fiatfalva near Székely-Keresztúr, where two separate congregations,
each with its own minister, Bible, hymn-books and organ, use the
church alternately, and attend each other’s worship.
29 As the church was
responsible for both the religious and the secular education of the
young, each well organized congregation employed a teacher whose
office was only less important than that of the minister. He was often
a minister awaiting settlement, or a theological student, and was in
effect an assistant minister.
30 v. supra, p.
107. Cf. Kohn, Sabbatharier, p. 129ff; Köváry, ‘Pécsi,’
pp. 34–38.
31 Cf. Magyar Emlékek,
x, 14.
32 Cf. Magyar Emlékek,
viii, 108.
33 Cf. Magyar Em1ékek,
ix, 415.
34 Cf. Geleji, Titkok,
p. 271.
35 Cf. Kohn, Sabbatharier,
p. 199. The sentences to death or imprisonment were almost
always remitted, but confiscation of property was uniformly enforced.
Id. op., pp. 209, 216 f.
36 Cf. Magyar Emlékek,
x, 182–190.
37 Cf. Kohn, op. cit.,
p. 223.
38 Cf. Kohn, op. cit.,
p. 225. Also Baron Zsigmond Kemény’s historical romance, A Rajongók
(the Fanatics), in which Pécsi is the hero, and the sufferings of
the Sabbatarians are described. Miklós Josika’s novels tell of
persecutions under the Báthoris and the Rákóczis.
39 Cf. Keresztény Magvetö,
xiii (1878), 362–366; xiv (1879), 35; xvi (1881), 323; xvii
(1882), 108, 217; Kohn, Sabbatharier, p. 232 f.
40 Cf. Adolf Dux, Aus Ungarn
(Leipsig, 1880), 270 f; Kohn, op. cit., p. 263.
41 Cf. Kohn, Sabbatharier,.
pp. 269–296.
42 Though another died as a
result of flogging.
43 Cf. Magyar Emlékek, x,
203; Geleji, Titkok, pref.; Kohn, op. cit., p. 217
ff; Uzoni, Historia, ii, 984.
44 Cf. Uzoni, Historia,
ii, 767–769.
45 For the Consensus,
see Uzoni, Historia, ii, 978 f; Bod, Historia, i, 451,
ii, 304–306; Wallace, Antitrin., iii, 556 f; cf. supra,
p. 86. For the confessions referred to above, see Uzoni,
Historia, ii, 977 f; Bod, Historia, ii, 303 f.
46 Cf. Magyar Emlékek,
x, 174–181; Uzoni, Historia, ii, 979–983; Bod, Historia,
ii, 306–310; Sándor Szilágy, ‘Az Unitáriusok . . . s a deési
Complanatio,’ etc. (The Unitarians and the Deés agreement),
Keresztény Magvetö, ix (1874), 150 ff.
47Cf. supra, p. 100.
48 The items thus adopted were
those already in use, and no new one was composed until 1670, nor was
any allowed to be printed until 1693. Cf. Uzoni, Historia, 569.
49 Moses Pap, in 1875, as
quoted by Rath, Siebenbürgen p. 142.
50 Cf. Uzonj, Historia,
ii, 655.
51 Cf. Uzoni, Historia, ii,
656,670.
52 v. supra, vol. i.
p.472.
53 Cf. Georg Kraus,
Siebenbürgische Chronik, 1608–1665 (Fontes Rerurn Austria~ carom,
Abt. i, Bde. 3, 4), Wien, 1864, iii, 241, 276, 284.
54 Cf. Johannes Bethlen,
Rerum Transylvanicarun, libri quatuor (s. 1., 1664), lib. ii, Sec.
2, 3; Bod, Historia, ii, 251.
55 Cf. Bethlen, op. cit.,
p. 62.
56 Cf. Uzoni, Historia,
ii, 990.
57 Among others, Christian
Francken Rector of the school at Chmielnik, to be Professor at
Kolozsvár, 1585–99; Valentin Radecki Rector of the school at Lucławice,
to be Pastor of the Saxon church 1605, Superintendent 1616–32,
and chief Pastor 1622–32; Joachim Stegmann Rector at Raków, to be
Pastor of the Saxon church, 1632–33; Adam Franck Rector at Raków, to
be Pastor of the Saxon church, 1633–55; Valentin Baumgart
Rector at Lucławice to be Rector at Kolozsvár, 1648, and chief Pastor,
1661–72.
58 Cf. Uzoni, Historia,
ii, 785–789; Kraus, Chronik, iv, 149; Benkö, Transsilvania,
ii, 582–584 Elek Jakab, ‘Magyar-Lengyel Unitárius Erintkezések’
(Intercourse between Hungarian and Polish Unitarians), Századok
(Budapest), xxvi (1892), 298–316; 474–494; Székely, Történetei,
p. 208 f; Lubieniecius, Historia, p. 297 f.
59 Dated January 19,1661. Cf.
Elek Jakab, Oklevéltár, ii, 375 f.
60 Dated March 7, 1663. Signed
by their Pastor and 23 others. Original Ms, as well as various records
of the exiles, are in the archives of the Unitarian College at
Kolozsvár.
61 Only 30 heads of families,
says Jakab, Magyar-Lengyel, p.381; others say only 35
individuals.
62 The house is still in
existence at No. 13 Belsö Monostor Utca (Strada Memorandului) near
the great square.
63 One was at Bánffy Hunyad,
about 30 miles west of Kolozsvár; one at Adámos on the Küküllö, about
fifteen miles southwest of Maros-Vásárhely, and a small one was at
Arkos in the Szekerland, north of Sepsi-Szent György. In these places
the Poles being few worshiped with the Hungarian congregation though
holding separate services when they were able and observing baptism
and the Lord’s Supper after the Polish usage. But this practice was
soon discouraged by the synod for fear of schism arising
64 Cf. Elek Jakab, ‘Adalékok a
Magyar és lengyel Unitáriusok közötti viszony,’ etc (Ancient relations
between Hungarian and Polish Unitarians), Keresztény Magvetô,
xxix (1894), 316–324; and the same author’s article in Századok
above mentioned, pp. 1–43; Domokos Simén, ‘Origo piarum fundationum
apud Polonos Claudiopoli collectos, Keresztény Magvetö, xi
(1876), 335–339; Tadeusz Grabowski, Literatura Aryańska w Polsce
(Arian Literature in Poland), Kraków, 1908, pp. 346, 488.
65 Cf. Kanyaró, Unitáriusok,
p. 223 f.
66 Cf. Áron Buzogány,
‘Augusztinowics Pál életrajza,’ etc. (The Life of P. A.),
Keresztény Magvetö, iv (1864), 11–36.
67 Cf. Uzoni, Historia,
ii, 661, 665.
68 Treaty of June 28, 1686; cf.
Johannes Borbis, Die evangelisch-lutherische Kirche Ungarns (Nördlingen,
1861), p. 494.
Chapter 8
1 Cf. Lampe, Historia,
pp. 872–919.
2 Cf. Uzoni, Historia,
ii, 680–689; Bod, Historia, ii, 192–194. Quatuor receptae :religiones
nullo unquam modo, ternpore, et praetextu, in suo libero exercitio
turbentur sed omnes ecciesiae, templa, scholae, parochiae, in suo
usibus, cultibus, terminis, proventibus, privilegiis et
consuetudinibus, hactenus usitatis, in etiam eorum ministr in suo
ministerio honore et libertate jntacte conserventur.
3 Cf. Uzoni, Historia,
ii, 695–699; Bod, Historia, ii, 197–203.
4 Cf. Uzoni, Historia,
ii, 701–729; Bod, Historia, ii, 204, 207.
5 Cf. Uzoni,
Historia, ii, 780, 1014—1022.
6 Cf. Uzoni, Historia,
ii, 911 f.
7 Cf. Uzoni, op. cit.,
ii, 916–918.
8 Cf. Székely,
Történetei, p. 163; Uzoni, op. cit., i, 571–579.
9 Cf. Uzoni, Historia,
ii, 671–673.
10 Cf. Uzoni, op. cit.,
ii, 676. Responses were prompt and generous. From the home churches
1,688 Hungarian florins were subscribed, besides generous gifts of
material; and sixteen months after the fire the new building was
roofed in. From the churches in Holland there were given in the next
year 9,500 florins. The correspondence is extant in the Remonstrant
library at Rotterdam (Ms 529), and the elaborate letter of thanks,
signed by the Superintendent and all the District Superintendents in
the name of the churches, dated 1700, is given in Uzoni, op. cit.,
pp. 677–679. Cf. also W. J. Kühler, Socinianisme in Nederland (Leiden,
1912), p. 205.
11 For the correspondence, cf
Uzoni, Historia, ii,1048–1056.
12 In order to have the right
background for judging this period of persecution, it needs to be
borne in mind that of old in Transylvania churches and schools had at
first been built at public expense, and were thus the possession of
the whole community. When the Reformation came the Catholics had in
most communities been dispossessed by the overwhelming Protestant
majority; for in all Transylvania there were only five towns in the
Hungarian counties in which Catholic churches remained, besides those
in four remote Szekler districts. Cf. József Ferencz, Kleiner
Unitarier-Spiegel (Wien, 1879), p. 20. But as the religious
complexion of the communities gradually changed after the death of
King John and under the Catholic revival, and the Unitarians became
proportionately weaker under the increasing pressure of persecution
upon them, the other confessions naturally urged their claims to a
share of the common church and school property in various communities.
The Catholics moreover were disposed to claim that even when usurped
by Protestants the churches had always remained the property of the
Catholic Church, and to demand restitution whenever even a small
proportion of the population asserted their claim. If the Catholic
administration now supported their claim by force, the Unitarians
would naturally feel unjustly deprived of what had for generations
been regarded as theirs. With rights so mixed, and patience and
consideration so seldom shown, violence was bound to occur, and the
issue was likely often to be settled by superior force rather than by
peaceable means.
13 Cf. Bod, Historia,
iii, 213 f.
14 Cf. Chalmers,
Recollections, p. 13.
15 Cf. Uzoni, Historia,
ii, 920 f.
16 Cf. Uzoni, Historia,ii,
921.
17 Cf. Uzoni, Historia,
ii, 1097–1144; i, 575, 579.
18 From the time when
Transylvania was liable any day to be suddenly raided by Tatars or
Turks, the stone church of the village was the only place to which the
inhabitants might flee for safety from the enemy, and it thus became a
fortress, often surrounded by a high stone wall, which could withstand
siege. Within this wall, or in the church itself, as a place of
general safe-deposit, the people would store their most valuable
treasures, their fine clothing, and even their staple provisions. The
same tradition was sometimes followed even in towns where it was less
necessary, and it is continued to this day in many of the rural
villages.
19 Confessio fidei
Christianae secundum Unitarios, etc. (Kolozsvár, 1719), 7 pp., 40.
Incorporated in Uzoni, Historia, ii,1139 ff. This Confession
was originally composed by Benedict Wiszowaty, minister to the exile
church at Andreaswalde in East Prussia (whose son Andrew was minister
to the exile church at Kolozsvár, 1724–35), and was dedicated to the
Elector of Brandenburg at a time when danger threatened the Unitarians
under his government (v. supra, vol. i, p. 516,n. 14).
20 Cf. Uzoni, Historia,
ii, 1130 f.
21 Cf. Uzoni,
Historia, ii, 1022–1025, 1039–1047.
22 Cf. Uzoni Historia,
ii, 1149–1155.
23 Cf. Uzoni Historia,
ii, 1157–1163.
24 Cf. Elek Jakab,
‘Szentábrahámi Mihály’ (with portrait), Keresztény Magvetö, i
(1861), 158–185.
25 Summa universae
theologiae Christianae secundum Unitarios (Claudiopoli, 1787). The
author’s name nowhere appears, hence it was sometimes attributed to
George Márkos, Professor of Theology at Kolozsvár, who prepared it for
publication. Hungarian trans., A Keresztény hittudomany összege az
Unitáriusok szerint (Kolozsvár), 1899. Cf. W. C. L. Ziegler,
‘Kurze Darstellung des eigenthümlichen Lehrbegriffs,’ etc., Neues
Magazin für Religionsphilosophie, iv (1800), 201–276.
26 Cf. Sándor Bodóczy, ‘Maria
Therezia egyházpolitikája és annak következménnye az Unitárius
egyházban’ (M. T.’s ecclesiastical policy and itsresults on the
Unitarian Church), Keresztény Magvetö, xliii (1908), 20–30,
84–93.
27 Cf. Bod, Historia,
iii, 303.
28 Cf. Bod, loc. cit.
29 In her treatment of
Protestants she is said to have followed the counsel of her Jesuit
confessor, Ignaz Kampmüller.
30 Cf. Elek Jakab, ‘Az
Unitáriusok üldöztetése a Jezuiták által’ (The persecution of the
Unitarians by the Jesuits), Keresztény Magvetö, xviii (1883),
388–399.
31 Cf. Bod, Historia,
iii, 339 f; Bodóczy, Maria Therezia, p. 92 f.
32 Cf. Bodóczy, op. cit.,
p. 96.
33 Cf. Bod, Historia,
iii, 332.
34 Cf. Bodóczy, op.
cit., pp. 85–91.
Chapter 9
1 For the text, cf. Johannes
Borbis, Evangelisch, pp. 119–121; and Gustav Frank, Der
Toleranz — Patent Kaiser Josephs II (Wien, 1882), pp. 37–41. A
similar edict for Transylvania was issued a few weeks later. Cf.
August Ludwig von Schlözer, Staatsanzeiger (Göttingen, 1782), i, 150.
2 Cf Elek Jakab, ‘Agh István
Unitarius püspök etc. (Stephen Agh Unitarian Bishop), Keresztény
Magvetö, xvii, (1882), p. 65 ff.
3 Cf. Lajos Nagy, ‘Suki László
élete és alapitványa’ (Ladislas Suki’s life and endowment),
Keresztény Magvetö, iii, (1867), 125–132.
4 Cf. Articuli Diaetales Anni
MDCCXCI (Claudiopoli, 1793), arts. 53, 55, 56, pp. 109–111.
5 Cf. A nemes Erdélyi
Fejedelemség, etc. (The noble principality of Transylvania),
Kolozsvár, 1791.
6 Cf. Wallace, Antitrin.,
i, 454–458.
7 For other brief notices in
this period, cf. Henry Maty’s New Review (London), vii (1663),
477; Robinson, Researches, 1792, p. 627 ff; Robert Adam,
Religious World Displayed (Edinburgh, 1809), ii, 150, briefly
reviewed in Monthly Repository, vii (1812), 82 f; Thomas Rees,
Racovian Catechism (London, 1818), p. xli ff.
8 Cf. Inquirer (London), Jan.
26, 1935, p. 4.
9 Published in Monthly
Repository, xv (1820), 193–199, and reprinted in Wallace, Antitrin.,
iii, 594–599.
10 Unitariorum in Anglia
fidei, historiae, et status praesentis brevis expositio (London,
April 30, 1821), 13 pp., 8ş. Signed by two Unitarian ministers. W. J.
Fox and R. Aspland.
11 The letter was in Latin,
dated Kolozsvár, August 31, 1821, and addressed to Fox and Aspland. It
gave a brief account of the organization, condition and history of the
church in Transylvania, reported 120 congregations and 40,000 members,
and requested further correspondence. Cf. Monthly Repository,
xvii (1922), 437 f; translation in Christian Reformer (London),
viii (1822), 253; Dionysius Lörinczy, ‘The Hungarian Unitarian
Church,’ Transactions of Unitarian Historical Society (London),
iii (1923), 20–39.
12 Published in the
Unitarian Fund Register, no. vi, pp. 51–56, bound in at the end of
the Monthly Repository, xx (1825).
13Utazas észek Amerikaban
(Travels in North America), Kolozsrár, 1824. See also his letter
to Fox, giving an ‘Account of the Unitarians of Transylvania,’ and
reporting a membership of 47,000; published in Monthly Repository,
N. S. v (1831), 648–651.
14 Said to have been younger
brother of the statesman Charles Sumner. Cf. Charles Lowe, ‘The
Unitarians of Hungary,’ Monthly Journal of the American Unitarian
Association (Boston), ix (1868), 423–426.
15 Cf. Áron Buzogány,
‘Augusztinovics Pál életrajza tekintettel a lengyel Unitáriusok
történetere’ (The life of P. A. of the Polish Unitarians),Keresztény
Magvetö, iv (1864), 11–36. Potrait.
16 Cf. Ferencz, Spiegel, p.
122 f, the 20th article.
17 For a picture of this period
in the form of historical fiction, see Maurus Jókai, Egy az Isten
(God is One); translated into German with the title, Die nur
einmal lieben, and into English (abridged) as Manasseh. Cf.
John Fretwell, The Christian in Hungarian Romance (Boston,
1901). The hero of the story is a Toroczkó pacifist Unitarian.
18 For an account of his
scheme, cf. Charles Loring Brace, Hungary in 1851 (New York,
1852), pp. 208–217.
19 Cf. Ferencz, Spiegel.
p. 25. When the Protestant confessions reorganized their institutions
after the Reformation, they gave the administrative head the title of
Superintendent. For a long time they preferred this title as tending
to break the chain of ideas associated with the title of Bishop. But
as time went on, in the period of Catholic supremacy, the title of
Superintendent came by contrast to betoken an inferior dignity; and
under the new order of things the title of Bishop (which had all along
been more or less employed unofficially) was authorized as official,
and taken as signifying an ecclesiastical rank equal to the other,
thus indicating that the four received religions were recognized as of
equal rank. Cf. Elek Jakab, ‘Az unitárius püspöki jogosultsága’ (The
right to the title of Unitarian Bishop), Keresztény Magvetö,
xxviii (1893), 199–205.
20 Cf. Christian Reformer,
N.S. xiii (1857), 301–304, 374–378, Quarterly Journal of
American Unitarian Association (Boston), iv (1857), p. 486 f; v
(1858), 234–241; Inquirer (London), xvii (1858), 815 f.
21 In the matter of statistics
the Transylvanian churches continued the Catholic custom of numbering
not merely the confirmed adult membership, but the whole population of
the church families, of whatever age. Thus, when taken by western
standards, the membership would be much smaller than the statistics
indicate.
22 John Paget (1808–‘92), born
near Loughborough in Leicestershire, educated at the Unitarian
Manchester College at York, studied medicine, and traveled widely in
southeastern Europe. His Hungary and Transylvania (2 vols.,
London, 1839) did much to make those countries better known. He
married a Hungarian baroness and settled in Transylvania where he
promoted scientific agriculture. He endowed an English chair at the
Unitarian College at Kolozsvár in memory of his son. Cf. János Kovács,
‘Paget János, Esq. Életirata’ (Life of J. P., Esq.), Keresztény
Magvetö, xxviii (1893), 96–1. Portrait.
23 A foundation for intelligent
interest in their cause had been laid in 1846 when Stephen Kovács
contributed an informing article (much the best, hitherto), annotated
Paget, an ‘Antitrinitarianism in Transylvania,’ to J. R. Beard’s
Unitarianism Exhibited (London, 1846), pp. 296–315.
24 Cf. M. Lucy Tagart, The
Hungarian and Transylvanian Unitarians (London, 1903). v.
also the article by Mr. Paget in Christian Reformer, N. S., xiv
(1858), 746–752, and Inquirer, xvii (1858), 762 f.
25 Which however was
unfortunately clouded by the fact that Mr. Tagart was taken seriously
ill on his return journey, and died at Brussels on October 12. This
broken ion was supplemented in 1859 by a visit from the Rev. S. A.
Steinthal of Manchester, Kilt out by the Association. Cf. his
published account infra.
26 Cf. Joseph Ferencz, Short
Account of the Unitarian Church of Hungary (Budapest, 1907), pp.
27, 34 ff.
27 After the beginning of the
twentieth century an occasional student from Transylvania reported for
graduate study at one of the American schools.
28 Published accounts of these
visits give a more vivid contemporary sense of the life of the
Unitarian churches during this period than any purely historical
narrative could do. Cf. S. A. Steinthal, ‘Account of a Visit to
Transylvania,’ Christian Reformer, N. S. xv (1859), 477–489,
530–538; also Inquirer, June 25, 1859; J. J. Tayler, ‘Narrative
of a Visit,’ etc., Theological Review (London), vi (1869),
2–48, also separately; Alexander Gordon, Tercentennial
Commemoration of Francis Dávid (London, 1879); Chalmers,
Recollections; Henry Ierson, Report of a Visit to Hungary
(London, 1891); Tagart, op. cit. See also articles by
American visitors in Unitarian Review (Boston), ii (1874), 357;
xvii (1882), 38; xxiii (1885), 134; xxiv (1885), 33, 117 Monthly
Journal, x (1869), 83, 396.
29 When the Transylvanian
University was established at Kolozsvár in 1872 both the Rector and
the Pro-rector chosen were Unitarians formerly connected with the
Unitarian College there.
30 Cf. Lörinczy, op. cit.
31 Including 54 filialae,
that is, ‘mission congregations,’ unable as yet to support a
minister of their own, but with worship regularly conducted by a
neighboring minister.
32 Cf. ‘The situation in
Transylvania, and an appeal for help,’ Christian Register
(Boston), Jan. 15, 1920; Louis C. Cornish, Transylvania in 1922
(Boston, 1923); id., The Religious Minorities in Transylvania
(Boston, 1925); John M. Cabot, The Racial Conflict in Transylvania
(Boston, 1926); Roumania Ten Years After (Boston, 1928).
Also for ex parte treatments (to be read with critical
caution), Henrietta M. Tichner, Roumonia and her Religious
Minorities (London, 1925); Zsombor de Szász, The Minorities in
Roumanian Transylvania (London, 1927); Sylvius Dragomir, The
Ethnical Minorities in Transylvania (Geneva, 1927).
33 A summary account of his
manifold services is to be found in Denis Valentine Szantó, With
God against Hitler (Budapest, 1946).
34 Cited by Athanase Coquerel,
Fils, ‘Une Visite aux Chrétiens Unitaires de Transylvania,’ Revue
Politique et Littéraire (Paris), 2e série, iii (1873),
426. Cf. also Elek Jakab, ‘Egyháztörtenelmi Adatok’ (Contributions to
Church History), Keresztény Magvetö, xviii (1883), 388 ff; id.,
Unitáriusok, 388–399.
35 Ignaz Aurelius Fessler,
Die Geschichten der Ungarn und ihrer Landsassen (Leipzig,1815).
36 Cf. Révész, Kováts and
Ravasz, Hungarian Protestantism (Budapest, 1927), pp. 123–127;
Ferencz, Account, pp. 12–16; György Tóth, Az Unitárius
Egyház Szervezete (The organization of the Unitarian Church), 3
vols. (Cluj-Kolozsvár, 1922); Stephen Borbély, Article on the
Constitution of the Hungarian Unitarian Church, in Christian
Seedsower (Birmingham), no. 1, 1922.
37 Any confessions or
statements of belief presented at Deés in 1636 or before or after are
long since disregarded as antiquated.
Chapter 10
1 Cf. Joshua Toulmin, Review
of the Life . . . of the Rev. John Biddle (London, 1789),
p. 13.
2 Cf. Dictionary of National
Biography, s. v.
3 Cf. D.N.B., s. v.;
Thomas Crosby, History of the English Baptists (London,
1738),i, 20 f; Alexander Gordon, Heresy (London, 1913), pp.
16–18, 59 f; John Foxe, Acts and Monuments (London, 1870), iii,
221–234.
4 Cf. D. N. B., s. v.;
Alexander Gordon, Heads of English Unitarian History (London,
1895), p. 14; Gaston Bonet-Maury, Early Sources of English
Unitarian Christianity (London, 1884), pp. 27–29.
5 The so-called ‘Wyclif’s
Bible’ was probably translated not by him but by his disciples.
6 Cf. Daniel Neal, History
of the Puritans (London, 1822), i, 13 f.
7 Cf. Bonet-Maury, op. cit.,
p. 44 f.
8 Cf. Gilbert Burnet,
Abridgment of the History of the Reformation (London, 1728), ii,
80 f.
9 Cf. Benjamin Evans, The
Early English Baptists (London, 1662), i, 46. Other authorities
give different figures.
10 Cf. John Strype,
Ecclesiastical Memorials (Oxford, 1822), II, i, 369.
11 Cf. Robert Wallace,
Antitrinitarian Biography (London, 1850), i, 5.
12 Cf. David Wilkins,
Concilia Magnae Britanniae (London, 1737), iv, 40–42; John Strype,
Memorials of Thomas Cranmer (Oxford, 1840), i, 255–257;
Monthly Repository of Theology (London), vii (1822), 222,
13 Cf. Strype, Memorials,
II, i, 375–382; id., Cranmer (Oxford, 1822), i, 335–346;
John S. Burn, History of the French, Walloon, Dutch and other
Protestant Refugees settled in England (London, 1846), passim;
Bonet-Maury, Sources, pp. 60–66, 115–136; The King’s
Letters Patent in Burn, op. cit., pp. 265–268, and in Bonet-Maury,
pp. 236–243. There were also churches of foreigners in a score or so
of other centers.
14 Cf. Burnet
Abridgment ii 82 Wilkins Concilia iv, 44 f; Neal
Puritans, i, 50; Monthly Repository, vii (1812), 439–442;
Christian Relormer (London), iv (1818), 329; Wallace,
Antitrin., ii, 124–127; Evans, English Baptists, i, 80;
D. N. B., s. v.
15 Cf. Neal, Puritans,
i, 74–88; Strype, Memorials, III, ii, 554–556; Crosby,
English Baptists, i, 64.
16 Cf. Evans, English
Baptists, i, 102.
17 Cf. Wallace, Antitrin.,
i, 29; ii, 127–130; Strype, Memorials, III, i, 540–542.
18 Reprinted in part, with
comments, in Theophilus Lindsey, Historical View of the State of
the Unitarian Doctrine, etc. (London, 1783), p. 92 ff; Strype,
Memorials, III, 1, 434 f, 469, III, ii, 363–380; Wallace,
Antitrin., i. 23 ff; Joseph Henry Allen, Historical Sketch of
the Unitarian Movement (New York, 1894), p. 19 f; John Philpot,
Examinations and Writings (Parker Society), Cambridge, 1842, pp.
293–318.
19 Cf. Wallace, Antitrin.,
i, 30 f; Strype, Memorials, III, i, 543 f; Bartholomew
Traheron, Exposition of Part of St. John’s Gospel . . .
against the Arians (London, 1858).
20 Cf. Wallace, loc. cit.;
Anthony ŕ Wood, Athenae Oxonienses (London, 1721), i, 137,
148, also reprinted; D. N. B., s. v.
21 Cassiodoro de Reyna, said
to have been an avowed Servetian, was minister of the Spanish
congregation, 1558–63; but he afterwards fell into disgrace, fled the
country, and eventually returned to the Catholic Church. Cf. Henri
Tollin, ‘Cassiodore de Reina’ Bulletin de la Societé de l’histoire
du Protestantisme Français (Paris), xxxi (1882), 385–397; xxxii
(1883), 241–250. 289–298.
22 Cf. Wallace, Antitrin., i,
35.
23 Cf. John Strype, History
. . . of Edmund Grindal (Oxford, 1831), pp. 61–69.
24 Cf. Strype, op. cit.,
p. 66. Acontius, born in the Trentino probably in 1492, after
first studying for the priesthood, later chose the law. He next
pursued military science, and spent several years in the service of
the Duke of Pescara and at the court of the Spanish Viceroy at Milan.
Having become Protestant he left Italy in 1557 and took refuge at
Zürich with Ochino, was for a time at Basel where he associated with
the group of Italian liberals, and then at Strassburg where he met
English exiles, whom he later joined in England after their return
thither. He became a member of the Strangers’ Church, was granted
citizenship in 1561, and was in such favor with the Queen that
although the Bishop had excommunicated him in the same year he
dedicated his most important religious work to her in 1565.
Cf. Peter Bayle, Dictionary, Historical and Critical, ed. 2
(London, 1734–38), s. v.; Monthly Repository, xvi
(1821), 456–458; Bonet-Maury, Sources, chap. viii; Francesco
Ambrosi, Jacopo Aconcio (Trieste, 1888); Walther Köhler,
Acontiana (Heidelberg, 1932); Erich Hassinger, Studien zu J.
Acontius (Berlin, 1934); D. N. B., s. v.; Louis Anastase
Guichard, Histoire du Socinianisme (Paris, 1723), pp.261–264.
25 Twenty-five editions in all
are known, the latest and best being that edited by Walther Köhler (München,
1927). Gives full bibliography. Cf. Daniel Gerdes, Scrinium
Antiquarium (Groningen, 1762), vii, 123–133; id., Historia
Reformationis (Groningen, 1749), iii, 147; Observationes
Selectae (Halle, 1700–05), vi, 204–230; Lindsey, Historical
View, pp. 73–84; Girolamo Tiraboschi, Storia della Letteratura
Italiana (Modena, 1824), vii, 559,700, 818; Edoardo Ruffini Avonda,
‘Gli “Stratagemata Satanae” di GiacomoAconcio,’ Rivista Storia
Italiana (Torino, 1928), xiv, 113–141, and that by G. Rŕdetti (Firenze,
1945). English trans., Satan’ Stratagems (San Francisco,
1940); Thomas Crenius, Animadversiones philologicae et historicae
(Lugduni Batavorum, 1695), ii, 30.
26 Monthly Repository,
xvi (1821), 456 ff.
27 Cf. Wallace, Antitrin., i,
108 f.
28 Cf. Thomas Fuller,
Church History of Great Britain (London, 1837), ii, 508, quoted by
Crosby, English Baptists, i, 69–74; John Strype, Annals of
the Reformation, II, i, 564; Neal, Puritans, i, 273;
Wallace, op. cit., i, 35 f; Evans, English Baptists, i,
138–164; Edward B. Underhill, Struggles and Triumph of Religious
Liberty (New York, 1851), pp. 179–190.
29 Cf. Wallace, op. cit.,
iii, 554–556; Theophilus Lindsey, Apology on Resigning
the Vicarage of Catterick, ed. 4 (Dublin, 1775), 226–239; Wilkins,
Concilia, iv, 282; Gordon, Heresy, p. 24; Fuller,
op. cit., iv, 387 f; Crosby, loc. cit.; Fuller, op.
cit., iv, 387 ff; Neal, Puritans, loc cit.
30 Cf. a spectator’s account
by William Burton, in David’s Evidence (1602), quoted in
Christian Moderator (London), i, 37 (June 1, 1826); Wallace,
Antitrin., i, 7–39; Fuller, Church History, iii, 66f;
Strype, Annals, III, ii, 73; D. N. B., s. vv.
31 In addition to those spoken
of above, perhaps brief mention should be made in passing of three
others whose names occur in the record, information about whom is
scanty, vague or disputed. So Christopher Vitells (or Viret), the
first Familist preacher in England, who saved his life by recanting
(Gordon, Heads, p. 16). Also Christopher Marlowe (1564–93), the
dramatist contemporary with Shakspere, who is said to have denied God
and his Son Christ, blasphemed the Trinity, and written against it,
though the charge is denied as a Puritan libel (Wallace, Antitrin,
i, 40–42; Wood, Athenae, i 338; Monthly Repository,
ix (1814), pp. 117, 302; Theophilus Cibber, Lives of the Poets,
etc. (London, 1753), i, 85 f). So also Thomas Mannering,
Anabaptist of Norfolk who denied the deity of Christ, declaring that
he was only a man, though endowed with infinite power from God.
Against him Alexander Gill published a Treatise concerning the
Trinity in 1601. What became of him is not of record (Wallace,
Antitrin., i, 39; ‘Wood, Athenae, i, 602; John Masson,
Life of John Milton (Cambridge, 1859), iii, 157, 385, 389).
32 Cf. Wa1lace, Antitrin.,
i, 42 f.
33 Cf. supra, vol. 1,
pp. 541 f, 411.
34 Cf. Fuller, Church
History, iii, 252–255; John Locke, Works (London,
1824), ix, 188–197; Crosby, English Baptists, i, 107; Lindsey,
Historical View, pp. 289–294; id., Apology, pp. 47–51;
id., Conversations on Christian Idolatry (London, 1792), p. 119
f; Christian Reformer, N. S., xi (1884), 100, 227 f, 343;
Wallace, Antitrin., ii, 530–534; ‘Florence Gregg,
Bartholomew Legate, the last of the Smithfield Martyrs (London,
1886), historical fiction.
35 See the warrant and
narrative, quoted by Theophilus Lindsey, Conversations on the
Divine Government (London, 1802), i, 119 f.
36 Cf. Fuller, Church
History. iii, 255; Neal Puritans, i, 259; Crosby,
English Baptists, i, 108, Appendix i; Wallace, Antitrin.,
ii, 534–539,iii, 565–568; Lindsey, Apology, pp. 52–55;
Christian Reformer, N. S. xi (1844), 99–103, 227 f, 343.
37 Cf. Neal, Puritans,
i, 260.
38Archbishop Tillotson thus
spoke in warm appreciation of the Socinians and of their temperate
manner in doctrinal controversy. Cf. his sermon on the Divinity of our
blessed Saviour, Works (London, 1820), iii, 310 f, quoted by
Krasinski, Reformation in Poland, ii, 407.
39 v. supra, p.
148.
40 Cf. John Tulloch,
Rational Theology and Christian Philosophy in England (Edinburgh,
1872), i, 76–343.
41 Cf. John Aubrey, Brief
Lives, chiefly of Contemporaries (Oxford, 1898), i, 278; D. N.
B., s. v,; John James Tayler, Retrospect of the Religious Life
of England (London, 1845), p. 306.
42Cf. Farindon’s letter
prefixed to Hales’s Golden Remains (London, 1688), p. 3.
43 Cf. Francis Cheynell,
Rise, Growth, and Danger of Socinianisme (London, 1643), p. 39 f.
44 Cf. Jared Sparks,
Collection of Essays and Tracts in Theology, from various authors
(Boston, 1825), vol. v for a sketch of Hale’s life, and his writings
here cited; D. N. B,, s. v.
45 Cf. Pierre des Maizeaux,
Historical and Critical Account . . . of Chillingworth
(London, 1725); Tulloch, Rational Theology, i, chap. iv; D.
N. B., s. v.; Robert Aspland, ‘Brief Memoir of Mr. Chillingworth,’
Monthly Repository, ix (1814), I, 337, 206; Biographia
Britannica (London, 1747–66), iii, 508–518.
46The items in the controversy
were: Edward Knott (pseud.), Charity Mistaken (1630);
Christopher Potter, Want of Charity justly charged (1633);
Knott, Mercy and Truth (1634); id., A Direction to be
observed by N. N. (Chillingworth) (1636);Shillingworth, The
Religion of Protestants a Safe Way to Salvation (1638).